Northern Ontario Industrial Facility Expansion - Phase 2 — Claim Workbench

Folder: C:\Users\danaf\Downloads\_tmp_workbench_evidence
17
Total Artifacts
5
XER Updates
0
Emails (.msg)
12
Documents
0
Workbooks
0
Images
0
Unclassified
Run date
2026-05-03
Contract
CCDC2
98
TRUSTED

Top Concerns

  • [INFO] retroactive_baseline_edits_present: 1 retroactive baseline edit(s) detected — instances where the target dates of an activity changed in an update without the corresponding contractual change order or accepted recovery plan.
BLOCK: 0 WARN: 0 INFO: 1

Schedule Chain Summary

5
XER Updates
11
Manipulations Detected
1
High-Severity (WARN+BLOCK)
2025-03-03
First Data Date
2026-03-02
Last Data Date

Manipulations by Category

CategoryCount
activity_added1
baseline_retroactive_edit1
duration_changed8
taskpred_added1

Schedule Manipulation Log

UpdateSeverityCategory Activity / EdgeNarrative
1INFOduration_changedA1020Duration of A1020 changed 240.0h → 304.0h
1INFOduration_changedA1030Duration of A1030 changed 160.0h → 192.0h
2INFOduration_changedA2010Duration of A2010 changed 200.0h → 248.0h
3INFOduration_changedA2020Duration of A2020 changed 360.0h → 456.0h
3WARNbaseline_retroactive_editA2020Baseline target dates EDITED on in-progress activity A2020 (had actuals)
3INFOduration_changedA3010Duration of A3010 changed 480.0h → 536.0h
4INFOactivity_addedA6020-CO12Activity A6020-CO12 introduced in update 4
4INFOduration_changedA4020Duration of A4020 changed 160.0h → 200.0h
4INFOduration_changedA6010Duration of A6010 changed 480.0h → 600.0h
4INFOduration_changedA4010Duration of A4010 changed 320.0h → 400.0h
4INFOtaskpred_added16TASKPRED added: pred=13 → succ=16 (PR_FS)

Rolling-Baseline Insertions

Rolling baseline written to C:\Users\danaf\Downloads\_tmp_workbench_v1\Northern_Ontario_Industrial_Facility_Expansion___Phase_2_Rolling_Baseline.xer. Preserved 15 original baseline activities. Inserted 1 new activities introduced mid-chain (per Dana's rolling-baseline rule, with as-introduced planned dates).
15
Preserved (Original Baseline)
1
Inserted (As-Introduced)
Task CodeNameFirst Appeared Planned StartPlanned Finish Duration (hr)
A6020-CO12CO-12 Process Equipment Skids 1 & 2 (Owner Change)2026-03-022027-04-212027-05-0480
Output XER: Northern_Ontario_Industrial_Facility_Expansion___Phase_2_Rolling_Baseline.xer

Evidence Ledger

17 total entries · range 2025-05-122026-05-03 · 0 undated.
docx: 4 pdf: 8 xer: 5
IDDateClassFilename Subject / TitlePartiesCodes PeopleOrgsRFI/CO
E-0012025-05-12pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdfRFI-014; A10201
E-0022025-05-15pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdfA102031
E-0032025-05-28pdfRFI-014-Response.pdfRFI-014-Response.pdfRFI-014; A102011
E-0042025-05-30pdfContractor-Letter-2025-05-30-Notice-of-Delay.pdfContractor-Letter-2025-05-30-Notice-of-Delay.pdfCCDC2; A102031
E-0052025-08-08docxPCO-007-Mat-Thickness-Change.docxPCO-007-Mat-Thickness-Change.docxPCO-007; A20201
E-0062025-08-12docx2025-08-12-Project-Coord-Meeting.docx2025-08-12-Project-Coord-Meeting.docxPCO-007; A2020; A20103
E-0072025-09-22pdfRFI-041-Steel-Weld-Spec-Clarification.pdfRFI-041-Steel-Weld-Spec-Clarification.pdfRFI-041; A301011
E-0082025-09-29pdfRFI-041-Response.pdfRFI-041-Response.pdfRFI-041; A301011
E-0092025-09-30pdfContractor-Letter-2025-09-30-RFI-041-Notice.pdfContractor-Letter-2025-09-30-RFI-041-Notice.pdfRFI-041; CCDC2; A301031
E-0102026-02-15docxCO-012-Process-Equipment-Skids.docxCO-012-Process-Equipment-Skids.docxCO-012; A6010; A6020; CO12; CCDC222
E-0112026-02-20pdfContractor-Letter-2026-02-20-CO-012-Notice.pdfContractor-Letter-2026-02-20-CO-012-Notice.pdfCO-012; CCDC2; A601031
E-0122026-02-25docx2026-02-25-Project-Coord-Meeting.docx2026-02-25-Project-Coord-Meeting.docxCO-012; A6010; A4020; A401011
E-0132026-05-03xerNOIFE_Phase2_Baseline_2025-03-03.xerNOIFE_Phase2_Baseline_2025-03-03.xer
E-0142026-05-03xerNOIFE_Phase2_Update_2025-06-02.xerNOIFE_Phase2_Update_2025-06-02.xer
E-0152026-05-03xerNOIFE_Phase2_Update_2025-08-04.xerNOIFE_Phase2_Update_2025-08-04.xer1
E-0162026-05-03xerNOIFE_Phase2_Update_2025-11-03.xerNOIFE_Phase2_Update_2025-11-03.xer
E-0172026-05-03xerNOIFE_Phase2_Update_2026-03-02.xerNOIFE_Phase2_Update_2026-03-02.xer

Entity Summary (NER tier: spacy_lg+regex · spaCy model: en_core_web_lg)

Corpus totals: 1 distinct people · 13 organizations · 2 RFI numbers · 2 change-order numbers. Reference: ASCE J. Legal Affairs & Dispute Resolution, Vol 17 No 4 (2025) — NLP for Construction Claims.

Top Actors

Sorted by distinct-evidence-count first (forensic signal), raw mention-count second (transparency-only — biased by repetitive content like long emails or threaded replies).
NameRoleEvidence ItemsMentions (raw)
RFIORG55
Meridian Construction Group Ltd.ORG44
CCDC2 ArticleORG22
Lakeshore Holdings Ltd.ORG22
CCDC2ORG11
CCDC2 Article 6.5ORG11
Contractor-Letter-2026-02-20-CO-012-Notice.pdf LetterORG11
Mat Foundations PourPERSON11
NOIFE_Phase2_Update_2025-08-04.xerORG11
Owner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf LetterORG11
Process Equipment InstallORG11
Project CounselORG11
Structural Steel ErectionORG11
TPOORG11

RFI Mentions

RFIEvidence Count
0144
0413

Change-Order Mentions

COEvidence Count
0123
121

Slip ↔ Evidence Pairings

14
Slips Analyzed
12
Evidence Items Paired
100.0%
Pairing Rate
12.0
Avg Evidence / Slip
Slip IDActivitySlipWindow EvidenceFilenameMatch Confidence Actors Involved
0:A6010A601095d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-010 docxCO-012-Process-Equipment-Skids.docx
both (1.00)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-011 pdfContractor-Letter-2026-02-20-CO-012-Notice.pdf
both (1.00)
E-012 docx2026-02-25-Project-Coord-Meeting.docx
both (1.00)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A6010 (see full pairings export)
0:A7010A701095d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-002 pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
E-003 pdfRFI-014-Response.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A7010 (see full pairings export)
0:M-FINM-FIN93d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-002 pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
E-003 pdfRFI-014-Response.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:M-FIN (see full pairings export)
0:A4020A402074d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-012 docx2026-02-25-Project-Coord-Meeting.docx
both (1.00)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
E-002 pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A4020 (see full pairings export)
0:A5010A501074d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-002 pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
E-003 pdfRFI-014-Response.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A5010 (see full pairings export)
0:A5020A502074d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-002 pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
E-003 pdfRFI-014-Response.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A5020 (see full pairings export)
0:A4010A401067d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-012 docx2026-02-25-Project-Coord-Meeting.docx
both (1.00)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
E-002 pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A4010 (see full pairings export)
0:A3010A301053d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-007 pdfRFI-041-Steel-Weld-Spec-Clarification.pdf
both (1.00)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-008 pdfRFI-041-Response.pdf
both (1.00)
E-009 pdfContractor-Letter-2025-09-30-RFI-041-Notice.pdf
both (1.00)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A3010 (see full pairings export)
0:A3020A302053d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-002 pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
E-003 pdfRFI-014-Response.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A3020 (see full pairings export)
0:A2020A202042d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-005 docxPCO-007-Mat-Thickness-Change.docx
both (1.00)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-006 docx2025-08-12-Project-Coord-Meeting.docx
both (1.00)
E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A2020 (see full pairings export)
0:A2030A203042d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-002 pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
E-003 pdfRFI-014-Response.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A2030 (see full pairings export)
0:A2010A201026d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-006 docx2025-08-12-Project-Coord-Meeting.docx
both (1.00)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
E-002 pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A2010 (see full pairings export)
0:A1030A103018d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-002 pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
E-003 pdfRFI-014-Response.pdf
date_within_window (0.50)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A1030 (see full pairings export)
0:A1020A102012d2025-03-03 → 2026-03-02E-001 pdfRFI-014-Subgrade-Contamination-Spec.pdf
both (1.00)
[ORG] RFI (in 5 evid., 5 mentions) · [ORG] Meridian Construction Group Ltd. (in 4 evid., 4 mentions) · [ORG] CCDC2 Article (in 2 evid., 2 mentions) +10
E-002 pdfOwner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf
both (1.00)
E-003 pdfRFI-014-Response.pdf
both (1.00)
… 9 more evidence item(s) for slip 0:A1020 (see full pairings export)

Recurring Actors

Names appearing across 3 or more distinct slip pairings. Threshold (3+) is a CPP heuristic for surfacing names that appear frequently in the corpus; AACE 29R-03 and SCL Protocol do not publish a numeric cutoff for "recurring actor" significance. Use as an investigative starting point, not a legal characterization or affiliation finding.
NameRoleSlipsDistinct EvidenceTotal MentionsParty Correlation
RFIORG147070Unknown (no domain match)
Meridian Construction Group Ltd.ORG145656Unknown (no domain match)
CCDC2 ArticleORG142828Unknown (no domain match)
Lakeshore Holdings Ltd.ORG142828Unknown (no domain match)
CCDC2ORG141414Unknown (no domain match)
CCDC2 Article 6.5ORG141414Unknown (no domain match)
Contractor-Letter-2026-02-20-CO-012-Notice.pdf LetterORG141414Unknown (no domain match)
Mat Foundations PourPERSON141414Unknown (no domain match)
Owner-Letter-2025-05-15-Subgrade.pdf LetterORG141414Unknown (no domain match)
Process Equipment InstallORG141414Unknown (no domain match)
Showing top 10 of 13 recurring actors.
Party correlation methodology. "Owner-corr 80%" means the actor was named in evidence where 80% of senders fell under the analyst-supplied Owner-domain mapping. This is a CORRELATION signal (who appears in whose correspondence) — NOT an affiliation claim. An Owner employee can be named in Contractor letters; a Contractor PM is often quoted in Owner emails. The 60% threshold for surfacing the tag (below which the column reads "mixed") is a CPP heuristic to filter noise — not a published forensic standard. "Unknown (no domain match)" indicates the analyst supplied a mapping but the senders did not match any entry; "—" indicates no mapping was supplied at all. Signal quality depends entirely on mapping completeness; verify the domain mapping covers all known parties before relying on any correlation result.

Trust Flags Detail

INFO  retroactive_baseline_edits_present

1 retroactive baseline edit(s) detected — instances where the target dates of an activity changed in an update without the corresponding contractual change order or accepted recovery plan. The baseline against which performance is measured should not drift mid-project without contractual basis; silent drift moves the performance reference point and obscures schedule variance. Severity tiers (>10 BLOCK, 4-10 WARN, 1-3 INFO) are CPP heuristics; neither AACE 29R-03 nor SCL Protocol publishes a numeric cutoff for tolerable retroactive-edit count. The flag indicates a CORRELATION worth verifying, not a finding of intentional baseline drift.
Re-run downstream variance analysis against the original frozen baseline rather than the as-submitted edited baseline. For each edit, request the change-order or float-allocation documentation that would justify the modification; absent such documentation, flag the edit for analyst follow-up review.