The Full Toolchain · Tool by Tool

The Suite.

Thirteen forensic schedule tools. One engine. Full AACE 29R-03 coverage. Connectable from any AI assistant that speaks MCP — or run as a deeper engagement against your own claim file.

13
MCP Tools
19
Analysis Modules
29R-03 · 122R-22
DCMA-14
Standards
734
Regression Tests
Schedule Health & Compliance

Grade the schedule before anyone argues over it.

DCMA-14 metrics, BEI, CPLI, false-criticality detection, and the parser that makes every other tool work. Run these before you trust a finish date.

dcma14_health_check

Schedule Health Dashboard

Full self-contained HTML dashboard — DCMA-14 plus CPLI, BEI, baseline-vs-current variance, slip register, GAO/AACE compliance bands, and a reproducibility manifest. Renders via headless Chromium.

DCMA 14-Point · GAO/AACE Bands
critical_path_validator

Critical-Path Validation

Logic health audit at the JSON layer — surfaces false criticality, constraint-driven CP segments, open ends, and the 14 DCMA metrics at the chosen profile (commercial, nuclear, mining). BEI when a baseline is supplied.

DCMA 14-Point · AACE 24R-03 §4
xer_parser

XER Table Summary

Parses a Primavera P6 XER and returns the table inventory — field lists, record counts, P6 export header, project name and data date. The structural confirmation step every downstream tool relies on.

Primavera P6 · XER Format
Forensic Delay Analysis

Six tools across the AACE-recognized methods.

Windows analysis (MIP 3.3), collapsed as-built (§3.8), TIA fragnet (52R-06), per-window concurrency, calendar-shaped execution, and slip-rate trending — all from the same XER chain.

forensic_windows_analysis

Windows Analysis (Headline Tool)

Multi-snapshot forensic windows analysis — per-window completion shifts, slip register, critical-path duration growth, per-party attribution (Owner / Contractor / Concurrent / Force Majeure / Unattributed), and cumulative project drift.

AACE 29R-03 §3.3 · MIP 3.3 Observational/Dynamic
collapsed_as_built

Collapsed As-Built / But-For

Subtractive but-for analysis on the post-impact XER — per-event but-for finish, cumulative but-for finish, and a dual-method gap report that validates the windows-analysis result independently.

AACE 29R-03 §3.8 · Modeled/Subtractive
time_impact_analysis_fragnet

TIA Fragnet Insertion

Prospective fragnet insertion into a pre-impact baseline — per-fragnet completion impact in calendar AND project-calendar working days, plus cumulative impact across all fragnets.

AACE RP 52R-06 · Modeled/Additive
concurrent_delay_matrix

Per-Window Concurrency Matrix

Window-by-window apportionment grid — how each window distributed its shift across the parties. Conservation-checked: column totals equal grand-total shift within rounding.

AACE 29R-03 §4.1 · §4.2.B Concurrency
woet_classifier

Worked-vs-On-time Timeline

Calendar-shaped per-activity day classifier — PROGRESS, GAIN, EXTENDED, VOID. Gives the trier-of-fact a calendar picture of how the project executed against how it was supposed to.

MIP 3.4 Enhancement Layer
slip_velocity

Slip Velocity & Acceleration

Per-window slip-rate trend on top of windows analysis — signed velocity (days per day), finite-difference acceleration, and centroid midpoint estimate. Honest probabilistic caveats embedded.

AACE 29R-03 §3.3 · Trend Layer
Path Analysis

Why is this activity critical — and what does it drive?

Single-activity logic-trace investigation, with constraint-driven artificial-criticality detection cited per AACE 24R-03.

path_explorer

Driver-Chain Explorer

Traces driving predecessors back to project start (the "why critical" chain) and successors forward to finish (the "what it drives" chain). Detects constraint-driven artificial criticality, supports MCPM and near-critical paths.

AACE RP 24R-03 §4 · MCPM-Aware
Risk & Probabilistic

P50, P80, and the maturity tier behind them.

Monte Carlo SRA with sensitivity tornado, plus a QRAMM maturity badge that grades the SRA evidence on a CMMI-style 1-to-4 tier — with the right caveats.

monte_carlo_p50_p80

Monte Carlo Schedule Risk

Probabilistic finish-date forecast — P10/P50/P80/P90 with linear-interpolation percentiles. Triangular, BetaPERT, Uniform, Lognormal distributions. Per-activity sensitivity tornado correlated to project finish.

AACE-Style Quantitative SRA
qramm_maturity

QRAMM Maturity Tier

Scores an SRA result against the AACE 122R-22 Quantitative Risk Analysis Maturity Model — tier 1 (Initial) through tier 4 (Optimized) — with disclosed evidence, gaps to next tier, and an interpretive caveat.

AACE RP 122R-22 QRAMM
Evidence Workflow

From a folder of mixed evidence to a unified workbench.

The way real claim files actually arrive: schedule updates, owner correspondence, RFIs, change orders, meeting minutes — all mixed together in one folder. This tool turns that into structured forensic output.

claim_workbench_evidence_ledger

Evidence Ledger + Chain-Diff

Takes one folder of mixed evidence and produces: chronological evidence ledger, 14-category schedule manipulation chain-diff, per-activity rolling baseline, statistical-impossibility trust score, and a slip-to-evidence cross-reference.

XER Chain · MSG/PDF/DOCX/XLSX
Beyond the MCP

Deeper skills available in custom engagements.

The thirteen MCP tools are the public surface. The toolkit also includes deliverable-shaped skills that produce DOCX, XLSX, and PDF outputs — used inside CPP claim work, available on engagement.

monthly-progress-report

Monthly Progress Report

Four-axis monthly snapshot — baseline variance, period-over-period progress, 30-day lookahead, current status. HTML dashboard plus DOCX executive report plus optional 5-page client PDF.

portfolio-dashboard

Portfolio Roll-Up

Aggregates 5-50 monthly progress reports into one self-contained HTML — RAG status, SPI/CPI rollup, finish-drift heatmap, top-five at-risk projects, aggregate critical-path roll-up.

3-week-lookahead

3-Week Lookahead

Field-ready Excel workbook from a P6 XER — Overview tab plus three Week tabs, locked layout/colors/fonts, week-over-week variance with DROPPED appendix when a prior workbook is supplied.

counter-claim-analysis

Counter-Claim / Defense Package

Tests an opposing party's delay claim against ten defense theories — concurrent delay, pacing, no notice, failure to mitigate, causation gap, float ownership, scope-change disguise, self-caused acceleration, LD cap. Rebuttal letter, defense workbook, rebuttal dashboard.

Pick the door. Same toolkit either way.

Try it live in your browser, wire it into Claude on your own machine, or hire the analyst behind it.