Anonymized engagements from CPP's forensic practice. Each was produced using the same toolchain and the same methodology applied to live work — full client identities and proprietary detail withheld; the analytical structure is real.
Windows Analysis (AACE RP 29R-03, MIP 3.3) of a multi-window municipal recreation centre construction matter. Per-window cause attribution across six months of contemporaneous schedule updates, with concurrency analysis and notice-gate review.
Measured Mile productivity analysis (AACE RP 25R-03) on a Northern Ontario gold-mining matter, with correspondence threading through the evidentiary record. Disruption-period productivity quantified against an unimpacted reference period, with party attribution.
Both case studies are anonymized — owner names, contractor names, project locations, and contract values are withheld or generalized. The analytical structure, the methodology, and the deliverable format are real and consistent with live CPP engagements. Full unredacted reference materials are available under NDA on request.
Send a brief description of the dispute, the contract value at stake, and where you are in the timeline. We'll tell you within a business day whether a CPP engagement is the right fit.
dana@criticalpathpartners.ca →